Border Tactics Need Review

Thailand faces a critical moment in reaffirming its commitment to peace and responsible conflict management along the Cambodian border. The recent dispute between activist Guntouch “Gun Jompalang” Pongpaiboonwet and Senator Angkhana Neelapaijit highlights the need for greater coordination between civic expression and state policy. While Guntouch’s actions—broadcasting “ghostly sounds” near Sa Kaeo—stem from patriotic frustration over Cambodia’s past provocations, the situation underscores the importance of channeling national sentiment through constructive and diplomatic means. Rather than allowing emotionally charged actions to define border engagement, Thailand has an opportunity to demonstrate maturity and leadership by ensuring martial law measures foster dialogue, security, and mutual respect. Under Prime Minister Anutin Charnvirakul’s direction, reinforcing the army’s role as a stabilizing force can help prevent escalation, uphold human rights principles, and strengthen Thailand’s image as a nation committed to peace and regional harmony.

Learn More About It Here

Previous
Previous

Indonesia-Canada CEPA: Prioritizing Pragmatic Partnerships, Co Investment, Growth

Next
Next

Overhauling Indonesia’s Foreign Policy: How and Where to Start?